Anterior Chest Wall Non-traumatic Arthropathies: A Crucial but Often Overlooked Site.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the distribution of Anterior Chest Wall (ACW) arthropathies in a tertiary care center and identify clinical, biological and imaging findings to differentiate osteoarthritis (OA) from non-osteoarthritis (N-OA) etiologies. METHODS: Search from medical records from January 2009 to April 2022, including patients with manubriosternal and/or sternoclavicular and/or sternocostal joint changes confirmed by ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The final study group was divided into OA and N-OA subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients (34 males and 74 females, mean age: 47.3 ± 13 years) were included. Twenty patients had findings of OA, while 88 were diagnosed with N-OA pathologies. SpA was the most common etiology in the N-OA group (n = 75). The other N-OA etiologies were less common: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4), Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome (n = 3), infectious arthritis (n = 3) and microcrystalline arthropathies (n = 3). Regarding the distinctive features, ACW pain was the inaugural manifestation in 50% of patients in OA group and 18.2% of patients in N-OA group (p = 0.003); high inflammatory biomarkers were more common in N-OA group (p = 0.033). Imaging findings significantly associated with OA included subchondral bone cysts (p < 0.001) and intra-articular vacuum phenomenon (p < 0.001), while the presence of erosions was significantly associated with N-OA arthropathies (p = 0.019). OA was independently predicted by the presence of subchondral bone cysts (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: ACW pain is a common but often underestimated complaint. Knowledge of the different non-traumatic pathologies and differentiation between OA and N-OA etiologies is fundamental for appropriate therapeutic management.

Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in Tunisia: main characteristics and detailed comparison with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to compare the clinical features, disease activity, and physical impairment between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in Tunisian patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in a single rheumatology center in Tunisia. Patients with axial spondyloarthritis fulfilling the 2009 ASAS criteria were included. The various spondyloarthritis-related variables were compared between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. p Values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 200 patients with axial spondyloarthritis, 40 had non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and 160 had ankylosing spondylitis. The non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients were more frequently female, were younger, and had shorter disease duration. Patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis experienced enthesitis more frequently compared with ankylosing spondylitis patients. Psoriasis was more frequent in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis group, while inflammatory bowel disease was more frequent in ankylosing spondylitis group. The C-reactive protein level and functional score were significantly higher in patients with ankylosing spondylitis compared with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were offered significantly more often to the ankylosing spondylitis group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in other spondyloarthritis parameters. CONCLUSION: The non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis is characterized mainly by a marked female prevalence, a higher enthesitis prevalence, and a better physical function. KEY POINTS: • Patients with nr-axSpA in Tunisia are more frequently female and have shorter disease duration compared with those with AS. • Peripheral manifestations were similar between nr-axSpA and AS patients except for enthesitis which were more frequent within nr-axSpA patients. • The disease activity is similar between the 2 groups of axSpA but the physical function is better within nr-axSpA patients.